Wednesday, January 28, 2015
|
Time states face up to
substance-abuse crisis
Anyone who read the story
in Sunday’s Sun of Zachary Gys’ descent into opiate and opioid addiction that
ultimately led to his death had to be moved by his parents’ struggle to find
him the proper care.
We salute Zachary’s father
Mickey Gys and mother Louise Griffin for having the courage to speak out about
their son, who lost his four-year battle with substance abuse at the age of 21.
This killer of
predominately white, middle-class males leaves families reluctant to discuss
this burgeoning epidemic due to the shame society associates with drug-related
deaths. Fortunately, the Lowell
couple refused to suffer in silence, and instead performed a public service by
detailing their frustrations and heartbreak in dealing with a public health
system ill equipped to handle this crisis.
This uphill fight is
further complicated by the state’s insurance industry, which has yet to agree
that substance dependency should be treated like any other physical ailment.
As Louise Griffin told Sun
reporter Todd Feathers: “The system is broken because there’s just not a
comprehensive enough approach to treat this disease.”
On both the public-health
and insurance fronts, it comes down to money. The resources dedicated to this
crisis — even with the legislation in July that dedicated $20 million for
expanded detox care — just scratch the surface.
The enormity of the
problem can be seen in these figures: According to federal data, the state
averages around 173,000 people dependent on illicit drugs each year. At the
same time, only 11 percent of those who should be in treatment are seeking and
receiving it.
Gov. Charlie Baker has
vowed to make this opiate epidemic one of his administration’s top priorities.
However, he’s saddled with at least a $765 million deficit.
We do see some promise in Vermont’s
“hub-and-spoke” system, where patients are treated and assessed to coordinate
care. Of course, this only works if there are sufficient inpatient and
outpatient facilities to handle the demand.
That July law also
requires insurers to cover up to 14 days in a residential facility, but State Rep. Tom Golden says that’s not
enough. Golden, who represents Lowell and Chelmsford,
filed legislation that would require insurers to cover substance-abuse problems
the same way they cover physical illness, and pay for up to 30 days in a
residential-treatment program.
You can bet this bill will
be vigorously fought by the state’s insurance lobby, but if we are to get a
handle on this substance-abuse scourge, this or similarly worded legislation
must be passed.
Drug overdoses in this
state during December alone took at least 60 lives.
No more foot-dragging. A
parent shouldn’t need to send a son 1,500 miles for treatment. The time for
coordinated action is now.
lowell sun 01/28/2015
No comments:
Post a Comment